|
|
| print this
ALCOHOLICS
ANONYMOUS
J.E DOHERTY, C.SS.R.*
The
most exciting spiritual movement in this country today,
outside of the Catholic Church, is Alcoholics Anonymous.
It is
neither a church nor a sect, but its members, rescued from
the
bottomless pit of helpless drunkenness, now spend themselves
in
relentless pursuit of other inebriates and derelicts abandoned
by
society as hopeless. When successful, they lead them to
a religious
experience or conversion which is lasting, and the number
thus saved
is spectacular. To a Catholic it is impressive that their
method of
dealing with souls derives directly from the inherited wisdom
of
traditional Christianity, and in its essence consists of
persuading
them to abandon themselves to God in humble prayer.
The
American scene, notorious for its absurd sects, strutting
evangelists, and eccentric Messiases and prophets, has yielded
nothing
heretofore as spiritually sound or as constructive as the
A.A. In
our complex society, alcoholism is not merely a grave problem,
it is
becoming critical; yet the sanest and soundest approach
to it has
been made by rehabilitated drunkards.
So
strikingly effective is their therapy of group-arrest for
helping the victims of drink that the first noted American
psychiatrist to befriend them, Dr. Harry M. Tiebout, thrust
his observations
before the American Society of Psychiatrists in words of
telling
force: "After observing personally for years the interesting
effects
of the A.A. program upon my patients .... I feel it highly
imperative
that we, presumably open-minded psychiatrists, view wisely
and long
the efforts of this group of former alcoholics .... At first
I was
amazed and chagrined when A.A. accomplished a change in
a patient
who was a failure under my therapy; now I am amazed and
astonished
when the patient fails under the A.A. program."
*
LIGUORIAN PAMPHLETS (1960)
While
the A.A. method leans on medicine, it is basically religious,
though it owes nothing to high-powered evangelical methods.
Its members as well as its founders shun publicity and seek
to be unknown.
Their ambition is to maintain their own sanity and sobriety,
and they
seek primarily to reform nobody but themselves. They have
found that
they cannot do this unless they first face the fact of their
own
ungovernable weakness, and then seek God's help in a program
of day
to day co-operation with His grace. Such realism in this
country is
a revolutionary approach to the alcohol problem.
The
ordinary way of dealing with the liquor problem is to ignore
it, or at least to suffer in silence. A tavern-keeper in
New York
quoted the famous eighteenth century writer, Samuel Johnson,
to prove
that the grog-shop has contributed more to earthly happiness
than any
other invention of man. Yet there are more than 3,000,000
chronic alcoholics in the nation today, and it is certain
that their families
think of alcohol largely if not solely in terms of unhappiness.
The
methods of extreme reformers on the other hand, are far
more
dangerous. The all-out reformer's viewpoint usually stems
from the puritanical idea that human nature is essentially
corrupt and cannot
be trusted to use liquor temperately. It was thus expressed
by one
Protestant sect called the Disciples of Christ at their
international
convention as late as 1941; "Alcohol is a character-destroying
poison,
a prolific cause of crime, the cause of untold poverty and
suffering ...
We believe, therefore, that those who do not protest against
the legalizing of this traffic are destroying their social
responsibility."
At
one time such convictions were so widespread in this country,
as a result of the abuse of alcohol, that they gave us national
Prohibition. It was called a noble experiment, but if we
are to judge it
by its effects, it was a thing of evil. It resulted perversely
in an
aggravation of the evils it sought to destroy, and led to
teen-age
drinking, alcoholism among women, gangsterism, and, according
to most
observers, contributed immeasurably to a general contempt
for law and
a revolution in sex-morality.
No
wonder Catholics in general opposed Prohibition on the grounds
that the Church did not teach that good things, when abused,
should be
destroyed, but rather the doctrine of voluntary abstinence
or temperance. Nevertheless, there are drinkers for whom,
whether for physical
or psychological reasons, "one drink is too many and
a hundred are
not enough." The Catholic Church is the last to deny
that moderation
is something very relative, and that for such individuals
any amount
of liquor at all is not only immoderate, but a proximate
occasion
of serious sin.
The
Alcoholics Anonymous offer their own life-stories to prove
that they fit precisely into this category; yet the knowledge
of this
fact alone would have been useless to them without a program
of life
guaranteed to bring them the help they need to survive each
day without a drink. This the A.A. program does for them
in twelve steps. What
is most significant about these steps is the fact that they
embody the
conditions of sincere, humble, confident, persevering prayers
for God's
help.
CLASSES
OF DRINKERS
There
have been many attempts by experts to classify the various
types of drinkers. Some of these lists are very complicated
and technical; one of them, for instance, contains twenty-eight
classifications.
However, for purposes of ordinary discussion, the following
simple
division may be presented. With relation to the consumption
of alcohol,
human beings may be divided into: 1) abstainers, who never
touch intoxicating liquor in any form; 2) moderate drinkers,
who use alcohol, but
never to the point of intoxication, nor so as to impair
their health;
3) intemperate drinkers, who drink in such quantity as to
become drunk,
or so as to injure their health.
The
intemperate drinkers are either: a) occasional drinkers,
who
ordinarily do not exceed the bounds of moderation, but do
so once in
a while, as at a birthday celebration or wedding party;
b) steady
drinkers, who habitually indulge in excessive amounts of
alcohol.
These
steady drinkers, again, are of three types: 1. environmental
drinkers, who take too much, not because of any inner need
or compulsion, but because of the circumstances in which
they are placed, for
instance, salesmen, bartenders, and waiters, who feel that
they have
to drink with their customers, and the young men and women
who frequent taverns because they do not know where else
to find companionship. 2. symptomatic drinkers, whose excessive
use of alcohol is merely
a symptom or manifestation of feeblemindedness or of a psychosis.
3.
alcohol addicts, who have an apparently uncontrollable craving
for
drinking to the point of intoxication.
Occasional
and environmental drinkers, since they lack an inner
drive or compulsion to drink, can ordinarily stop drinking
altogether,
or hold themselves within the bounds of moderation, once
they have
sincerely and firmly resolved to do so. Of course, it is
possible
for such persons to become so habituated to drink that they
cannot
get along without it; but then they must be ranked among
the addicts.
Usually, however, these individuals can be moderate if they
make up
their minds to it. What is more important for them is, first
of all,
to have a firm and unshakable resolution not to drink excessively,
and then to forsee the occasions when they will be tempted
to do so,
and to plan their conduct beforehand. Each man should set
for himself
a limit, beyond which he will not go under any circumstances.
When
he gets near the limit, it would be wise for him not to
drain the
glass, but to retain something in it, so that he can always
say: "No
thanks, I still have some." In this way, one has a
chance of escaping
the deplorable habit of some hosts, who, from a mistaken
idea of hospitality, presstheir guests to drink, and insist
on filling their
glasses constantly. One should respect another's freedom
not to drink,
and let each person judge for himself how much he should
take.
Feebleminded
and psychotic drinkers belong in an institution
under custodial care. That is the only way they can be safeguarded
from the deleterious effects of excessive drinking, and
the only
way that society can be protected against the wild rages
and brutal
actions to which alcohol sometimes drives such persons.
THE
ADDICT
It
is, however, the alcohol addict who constitutes the most
difficult problem for family, friends, priests, doctors,
social
workers, and others who are interested in their rehabilitation.
The
addict, as was mentioned, has an apparently uncontrollable
craving
for drinking to the point of intoxication. Many of these
are highly
intelligent individuals, who might make a valuable contribution
to
the society in which they live, if it were not for their
excessive
drinking. Often enough they realize the havoc that alcohol
is causing
in their lives, and declare with apparent sincerity that
they would
like to be rid of it, but cannot. Sometimes, they "go
on the wagon"
for a period; but inevitably fall back again. Persuasions,
threats,
appeals to their love and sympathy all seem to have no effect.
What
is the explanation of this strange, overwhelming desire
for intoxication?
One
who thinks that the alcohol addict drinks just because he
likes the taste of liquor, misses altogether the understanding
seriousness of the problem. Often enough, these individuals
actually
dislike the taste of alcoholic drinks. The truth seems to
be that
the addict drinks in order to escape the burdens and responsibilities
of life, which he is unable to face because of his emotional
immaturity. Alcohol Addiction is, then, essentially a psychoneurotic
reaction. Just as a hysteric adopts a form of bodily disability
in
order to escape an unpleasant situation; just as the neurasthenic
turns his attention to internal states and processes in
order to
avoid the consideration of conflicts in his life; so the
addict uses
alcohol as a screen to shut out unsatisfactory exterior
and interior
realities.
Alcohol
serves this purpose admirably, for its effect is to
anaesthetize first of all the areas of the brain that are
correlated
with the higher faculties of man, especially the discrimination
and
judgment. Consequently, there is a blunting of the power
of self-criticism, which allows a release of inhibitions,
and the free
expression of the lower emotions. Contrary to the ordinary
impression,
alcohol is not a stimulant, but a narcotic. Its apparently
stimulating
effect is the result of the relaxing of tension and anxiety
born of
the responsibilities and demands of life.
The
first thing that one notes in a person who has had even
a
little too much to drink is that he speaks more freely,
laughs more
boisterously, expresses opinions and tells things about
himself and
his family that ordinarily he would never think of revealing.
He is
less self-conscious, less worried about how he appears in
the eyes
of others. This slight relief of tension and inhibition
is what the
moderate drinker seeks in alcohol, and he is content with
this. He
does not wish to become intoxicated; he drinks in order
to enjoy
reality, not to shut it out and escape it.
But
the addict is not satisfied with merely clothing the details
of life in a rosy glow. He is so maladjusted that he wants
to shut
out reality altogether. As greater quantities of alcohol
are taken,
larger and larger areas of the brain are anaesthetized.
The lower
nerve centers begin to be affected, as can be noticed in
the thickness
of speech, the staggering walk, the incoordination of the
movements
of the hands of one who is somewhat advanced in his cups.
Gradually,
the behavior becomes more and more uncontrolled. There may
occur
shouting, maudlin weeping, loud laughter, and reckless or
quarrelsome
conduct. Eventually, an almost complete anaesthetization
is reached,
in which the person sits and babbles incoherently, or sinks
into a
drunken stupor. He is for the first time being shut off
from reality,
from the problems, responsibilities, and sorrows of life,
as an insane person in his cell.
It
is this escape from reality through intoxication that the
addict
is consciously or subconsciously seeking. Because of his
emotional
immaturity, he finds life too hard to meet, and turns to
alcohol as
a means to soften the blows of real life, as a way back
to the carefree
level of adolescence or childhood. From it he expects pacification
of
his troubles, release from responsibility, and the banishing
of anxiety.
Quite frequently there is in such a person a sense of inferiority,
a
dissatisfaction with self. From this alcohol provides an
escape by
producing a feeling of elation, of self confidence, by blowing
up the
persons ego.
Almost
always there can be discovered in the addict a history of
emotional immaturity, dating back to childhood. In the background
of
the picture there will be found at least one over-indulgent
and over-protective parent, who shielded the child from
every danger and hardship,
never training him to met the difficulties of life, or to
realize the
need of adjustment and self sacrifice in getting along with
others.
Or, on the other hand, there may have been parental tyranny
and
domination, such as to instill a pattern of fear in the
child's mind,
a sense of insecurity, and a lack of ability to make his
own decisions.
Thus, there is established the psychoneurotic personality.
When
such a person is removed from the parental care, he finds
that he is expected by society to behave in an adult way,
to accept
his share of decisions and responsibilities. But this he
cannot do;
for he is still emotionally a child. Consequently, he tries
to escape,
to blot out reality, to get back to the irresponsible period
of childhood. That such an individual takes to alcohol,
rather than to another
of the psychoneurotic reactions, is the result largely of
circumstances.
No personality is specifically determined to the use of
alcohol. The
personality furnishes the predisposition; the adoption of
a particular
escape mechanism depends to a great extent upon the environment.
Alcohol
is, indeed, the most available, and the most socially acceptable
to
the various solvents of unpleasant reality. But, if such
an avenue were
blocked to him, the maladjusted person would most likely
take up one
of the other psychoneurotic reactions, such as hysteria
or neurasthenia.
TREATMENT
From
this explanation of the underlying psychological causes,
one can see that the cure of an alcohol addict is a complex
and difficult matter. It is not enough to plead, beg, or
threaten. It is not
enough to place before the person the sad consequences of
excessive
drinking upon himself and his family. It is not enough to
keep alcohol
away from him for a time. For none of these methods strike
at the cause.
What the person needs is a complete reeducation for life,
such as to
produce the maturity of character which is lacking in him.
"If
thy right eye scandalize thee," says Our Lord, "cut
it out
and cast it from thee." That drink is a scandal in
the life of a compulsive drinker no one doubts, and least
of all the alcoholic himself.
Still he does nothing about it. Why? The study of this "why"
has intrigued many. He is a chronically sick man, some say;
he has a real
physical allergy towards liquor. It may have been this theory
that
gave the impetus to two Scandinavian scientists who compounded
and
produced a drug for the cure of alcoholism called antabuse.
Anyone
who takes a dose of this drug will become possessed of so
real an
allergy toward alcohol that he will become violently nauseated
at the
very smell of it. It is guaranteed to keep a man sober for
six months,
but it does not cure him forever.
Psychiatrists,
with varying and sometimes fantastic theories
about the cause of alcoholism, have applied them with but
indifferent
success. Nevertheless, an endowed clinic at Yale University
has found
in almost every case of compulsive drunkenness a personality
ill at
ease with reality from the time of childhood. In this clinic,
psychiatrical together with physical therapy has produced
good results, though
they do not compare with those achieved by A.A. Alcoholics
Anonymous
follows these experiments with keen interest, but as far
as they themselves are concerned, they consider it most
important to face the fact
of their weakness no matter what its cause. When they begin
to mistrust
themselves and to rely on a higher power, their cure has
really begun.
Sudden
conversion of drink addicts are nothing new in religion.
They occur dramatically at times when congregations gather
to pray
and meditate on the eternal truths, and not only at such
likely exercises as Catholic parish missions but also at
revivals led by groups
like the Salvation Army.
It
was in fact such a conversion that marked the beginning
of
A.A. It happened in Brooklyn, and the gentleman destined
to be a catalyst for the A.A. movement is known today in
alcoholic circles as
Ebby. Ebby illustrates the A.A. program only obliquely,
for he did
not persevere; but his conversion was genuine while it lasted.
His
brief excursion into the realms of sobriety took place as
the result
of contact with the streamlined religious sect called the
Oxford
Group. The Oxford Group was never able to provide a program
for Ebby
that would keep him permanently sober, but his temporary
sobering up,
which took place under their auspices, had the effect of
a chain
reaction that brought A.A. into being. The man really destined
to be
the founder of the movement was Brother "Bill,"
a Wall St. "wolf" or
"bear." John Barleycorn had led "Bill"
out of the stockmarket, where
he had been a great financial success, into bankrupcy.
Early
one November morning, Bill was seated in his kitchen surveying
the world with a mellow and judicious wisdom, aided by the
contents of a quart which he held in his right hand. Though
the world
on all sides was threatening to cave in on Bill, he was
sustained for
the time being by the thought of several bottles hidden
about the house
for the moment when his need would be greatest. At the moment
Bill's
wife had gone out to look for a job to see if she could
hold the
family together. Into this scene walked Ebby, fresh and
aglow and for
the first time within Bill's memory the glow was not from
alcohol.
The unaccustomed sight startled Bill. He and Ebby had been
school chums
together, and both were usually catalogued together as hopeless
"drunks."
There
was an unmistakable air of evangelism about Ebby; he had
come
with the avowed purpose of telling Bill how he had been
released from
alcoholism. Ordinarily religious talks nauseated Bill. He
had no faith
at all, yet he was fascinated and astounded that anything
at all could
have enabled Ebby to stop drinking. Ebby simply revealed
that he had
learned a few basic practices of religion, and as a result
had been
able to get along without liquor. When he left, the man
in the kitchen
kept on drinking, but he was a changed man.
A
month later Bill went on his last glorious binge and ended
up
as usual in Towns hospital, New York, a sanitorium for the
drying out
of alcoholics. The doctors shook their heads over him; it
was almost
the end of the road for him. The next stop would be insanity
or death.
Bill was in a deep depression when Ebby walked in again.
This time
Bill asked questions, and when his friend left, he cried
out in desperation: "Now I'm ready to do anything -
anything to receive what my
good friend has. If there is a God, He will show Himself."
According
to Bill, the result was instant, electric almost beyond
description.
"The place lit up, blind white. I knew only ecstacy
and seemed to be
on a mountain. A great wind blew, enveloping and permeating
me... One
with the universe, a great peace stole over me and I thought,
'So
this is the God of the preachers; this is the great Reality.'"
Bill
became frightened at his experience. His doctors were skeptical
when he tried to tell them about it, but one of them, Dr.
Milton
Silkworth, was shrewd enough to see that, whatever the experience
was,
it must be good if it kept Bill sober. It did just that,
and Bill
has never to this day taken another drink. He left the hospital
in
what is known as the "Chautauqua" phase of conversion,
that is, he
intended to look up every alcoholic he knew and lead them
all into
the same experience.
Wanting
to preach the gospel to everyone, Bill soon found that
something has to take place in the soul of the alcoholic
before the
preaching can have any effect on him. He did not grow discouraged
immediately, and his first crisis came when he seemed well
on the
way to picking up the pieces of his broken life. Months
later in
Akron, Ohio, he was on the trail of a financial deal that
would
recoup his fortune. Though he had failed to "dry up"
any of his
numerous alcoholic cronies, he himself had not tippled once,
and he
found that his efforts to help others were keeping him that
way.
Then
the crash came. The business deal began to fall through,
and Bill found himself walking the streets day after day
in a frightful tension. The doors of the tavern beckoned
and he became frantic
lest he go back to drink. Calling up clergymen, he found
out the name
of another hopeless drunk and made an appointment to talk
with him.
Thus the meeting between Bill and Dr. "Bob," the
second founder of
A.A., took the unique form of a converted drunk trying to
keep himself sober by talking another drunk into sobriety.
Eventually
it worked for both of them. They had much in common.
Both were from neighboring towns in Vermont; they had much
the same
background; but the chief thing they had in common was their
drinking
problem. Dr. "Bob," a capable surgeon, had managed
to drink himself
through medical school, and, though he passed out during
his final
examinations and flunked, he was given another try. He had
lived on
alcohol for many years.
During
one of his many dry spells he had married, and his wife
became the long-suffering alcoholic's widow. At the time
of his meeting with Bill, his drinking habits had almost
completely ostracized
him from all his friends. Through the mist of alcohol fumes,
Bill's
words penetrated and made sense. Far more important, however,
than
anything Bill said, according to the doctor, was the fact
"that he
was the first living human being with whom I had ever talked
who
knew what he was talking about in regard to alcoholism from
actual
experience. In other words, he talked my language."
Dr.
"Bob" stopped drinking abruptly. It is true that
before the
month was up he was off on another spree, but it was the
last one.
He had gone to a convention in Atlantic City and had come
back in
a liquid state, but Bill was still in Akron waiting for
his return.
The doctor had by now the necessity of working with others
to keep
himself sober. Before Bill left Akron, a group of Alcoholics
Anonymous had been started there by the two men, based on
the religious
principles that they had worked out for themselves. The
doctor, aided
by his wife, started a hospital for alcoholics in his own
home, and
in the course of ten years was to treat more than 4000 such
unfort-
unates.
Back
in New York, Bill started another group, and within three
years there were a hundred "Alcoholics Anonymous."
Of these, half
never took a drink again, a quarter fell back once or twice
but
eventually persevered, and the other quarter quickly went
back to
their cups. This has been the average number of conversions
maintained to this day, and the unconverted will probably
end up as
successful Alcoholics Anonymous when they finally learn
to be honest
with themselves.
Five
years after the first A.A. group was formed, twenty former
alcoholics were able to tell in print the amazing story
of their
spectacular recovery from constant drunkenness. Their stories
were
published in 1939 under the title, "Alcoholics Anonymous."
So great
has been the demand for this book that it has had to be
reprinted
every year since, sometimes twice a year. By the time the
book was
published, its leaders had evolved a program of twelve steps
which
were included in the text. Since that time, they have also
acquired
a number of salutary traditions and have published two more
books
explaining their faith. The movement has spread so rapidly
that today there are more than 250,000 members, with heavy
concentrations
in the British Isles and the Scandinavian countries.
The
first twenty alcoholics who published their conversion
stories spoke of God only as a "Higher Power"
and tended to play
down religion. There was a reason for this. Many of them
had been practical agnostics, and their turning to God,
as they describer it, resembled that of a drowning atheist:
"My God, if there is a God, save my
soul if I have a soul." However most of them did have
some faith at
one time. It is estimated that about forty per cent of the
A.A. had
a Catholic background, with the remainder divided up among
Protestants,
Jews and agnostics. If it is a religion that saves them,
why did it
not work before for those who had some faith? The alcoholic
answers
that neither the A.A. program nor religion itself can help
them until
they first learn to be honest and sincere with themselves.
Thus
the first step for the alcoholic is to be honest with himself
and to strip him of all illusion. "I stand defenseless,
utterly," says
the poet in The Hound of Heaven, "Naked I await Thy
love's uplifted
stroke." Francis Thompson pictures the sinner as hiding
from God and
fleeing from one created good to another until the Almighty
has calmly
stripped all his defenses away. Probably this is true in
every conversion, but it is certainly so with the alcoholic.
He is an alcoholic
precisely because he cannot bear with himself, cannot stand
naked in
the light of God's truth. He may be strong willed in other
regards,
aggressive, poised and even charming, but he is keenly sensitive
to
humiliation and is burdened with feelings of guilt. Alcohol
has become
for him the way out of a suffocating and intolerable impasse.
It is
when he reaches rock bottom and loses faith even in alcohol
that he
will cry out for God.
When
the grace to be humble comes to the alcoholic, the A.A.
program teaches him to make a searching and fearless examination
of conscience and to admit the exact nature of his weakness
and his sins.
For a Catholic this takes the form of a sacramental confession,
but
even the Protestant and agnostic remind themselves of the
old adage,
"Confession is good for the soul," and tell their
weaknesses to each
other.
The
next step in the program is the alcoholic's abandoning himself
to God. He is taught to say an ancient prayer put up in
modern
dress: "0 God, give me the courage to change the things
that must be
changed; the patience to endure the things that cannot be
changed; and
wisdom to know the difference."
Any
instructed Catholic will see that in these first steps are
embodied the conditions of effective prayer: humility, self-examination,
sorrow for sins, confidence in God and abandonment to His
will.
As long as the alcoholic maintains these dispositions, he
will obtain
the grace to overcome his weakness.
A.A.
members have learned the wisdom of Our Lord's words, "Sufficient
for the day is the evil thereof," and have applied
them specifically to themselves. The program impresses them
with the fact that
they are always to be alcoholic and that they will never
be able to
take a drink. Their sobriety depends on their abstaining
absolutely from alcohol in any form, but they are encouraged
by those who have
succeeded to do this on a twenty-four hour basis, as a day-to-day
venture. To maintain the all-important dispositions of humility
and
confidence in God's help, they meet once a week with their
fellow
alcoholics. These meetings are a powerful and usually a
necessary
psychological help, for they are encouraged by new tales
of conversion from drink and thus relive the miracle of
their own resurrection
from the dregs.
All
these tactics might have been taken from the traditions
of
the Catholic Church, though it can hardly be said that any
movement
in the Church has been as spectacularly successful with
out-and-out
alcoholics as the A.A. movement. Moreover they quote another
principle
that is unmistakably Catholic, viz., that "faith without
works is
dead." This principle works itself out practically
when the converted
alcoholics seek to carry their message of salvation to others.
God
seems to have blessed their apostolate in a special way,
and it has
become almost an adage that "it takes an alcoholic
to understand an
alcoholic."
Why
has the A.A. program succeeded when so many others have
failed? Chiefly because those who deal with drink addicts
seldom
have the humility and patience required. This is especially
true of
religious groups. The alcoholic ordinarily is no psychopath;
he is
like anyone else, only more so; more rebellious, resentful,
sensitive
and guilt-ridden. A condemnatory and moralizing attitude
such as is
often taken by religious groups intensifies these feelings
and sends
him into a tailspin. It was for this reason that A.A. broke
with the
Oxford Group in the beginning, and it explains why they
soft-pedal
religion when they pick up a prospect from the gutter. The
chances
are that religion at first will awaken only thoughts of
a patronizing or hard, dour-faced reformer.
Sympathetic
clergymen are, however, quite popular at A.A. meetings,
and this is especially true of Catholic priests. Fathers
Francis Ford, S.J., and Edward Dowling, S.J., have guided
the movement
from the beginning.
Emotional
experiences are probably the exception in the conversion
of alcoholics, and the program stresses the fact that they
are
not necessary. Nevertheless their way of life leads inevitably
to a
deepening of religious faith and, in some cases, serves
as a prelude
to entrance into the Catholic Church. The member of A.A.
who does
not at least return to the practice of his ancestral faith
will almost
certainly persevere.
It
is not unlikely that Alcoholics Anonymous will have a Catholic
saint as a patron, the reformed alcoholic of Dublin, Matt
Talbot. Though he has not yet been canonized, it seems probable
that he will
be, for there is no doubt that after his conversion he led
a life of
heroic sanctity.
As
an illness alcoholism is but an acute manifestation of a
disease
common to human nature. All of us have inherited a nature
wounded by
original sin, and it is this wounded nature that is our
heaviest burden and our cross. Alcoholics are not alone
in seeking escape from this
burden. But the more we seek escape from it, the heavier
the burden
grows. The advice of Our Lord was not idly given: "Take
up thy cross
and follow Me." To face ourselves with all our weaknesses
can be a
shattering experience for anyone who is living in a world
of illusion.
Yet Alcoholics Anonymous demonstrate dramatically that,
by being honest
and sincere with ourselves and abandoning ourselves to the
will of God,
we can obtain help to overcome any moral weakness no matter
how strong
or deep-rooted it may be. For this reason the twelve steps
of Alcoholics
Anonymous constitute a faith and a way of life not only
for alcoholics
but for anyone struggling with a moral weakness that is
becoming uncontrollable. Here are the twelve steps:
1.
We admitted we were powerless over alcohol (or our weakness)
- that our lives had become unmanageable.
2.
Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could
restore
us to sanity.
3.
Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the
care of
God as we understood Him.
4.
Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
5.
Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being
the
exact nature of our wrongs.
6.
Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects
of character.
7.
Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
8.
Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing
to
make amends to them all.
9.
Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except
when
to do so would injure them or others.
10.
Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong
promptly admitted it.
11.
Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious
contact with God as we understood Him, praying only for
knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that
out.
12.
Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these
steps,
we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice
these principles in all our affairs.
|
|